Few autobiographical post turned out, heh, it's not lack)) 1.When I worked in one organization, engaged in selling petroleum products, even an ordinary lawyer, I was spihnuli solution to the conflict with the old client – so old that he shipped volumes on parole, and documents, price and payment – and then, in hindsight. But one of the most beautiful days so happened that I encountered these discrepancies on the debt and the volume of shipment. A Documents sobssno almost net.Kak I solved the problem? I wrote a letter. 11 pages. Came to visit.
The table. Trades, assaults, foam at the mouth Concord is not even close "Let us listen to our lawyers." On the one hand, I still Green this, on the other – twice my age, red, fat guy with a brazen face and just Pruszcz ambition, they say, you wait, punk, dressed. I just did: built a logical chain from one fact to another, from argument to argument. The result was a completely coherent system. In this sense this method – _zakonchit_ its logical chain.
If it is closed, it's hard to beat. As a system of judgments sophists – the principle is the same. I still remember how then concluded: "Do you argue with the Civil Code?". And that redhead? Ginger just opened his mouth. He did (!) Did not say in opposition, something mumbled, and all. They say he then took a long time. And I I have not even heard of gratitude.